Deadly attacks on journalists are on the rise in Mexico, and perpetrators operate largely with impunity
On 2 January, journalist Moisés Sánchez was kidnapped by an armed
group. Nine people with covered faces stormed into his house in Medellin
de Bravo, a town in the wealthy eastern state of Veracruz. They
searched and grabbed documents, and took Sánchez, along with his camera,
laptop, mobile phone and tablet. The police took hours to come to the
house. Sánchez was found dead 23 days later on the outskirts of the town.
Sánchez, editor of La Unión,
is the eleventh journalist to be murdered in Veracruz since Governor
Javier Duarte de Ochoa took office on 1 December 2010. As well as
murders, four media professionals have gone missing and there have been 132 attacks against the local press in the same period.
Events in Veracruz state are serious, but they are far from exceptional. In vast zones of Mexico,
especially on the United States border and in areas where drug
trafficking prevails, journalists at all levels have been threatened or
attacked. Victims include some of the most nationally well-known
commentators but more frequently are reporters writing for regional and
local media, online and on social media.
The free press defence organisation Article 19
documents three chilling facts: attacks against communicators are
rising in Mexico, in most cases impunity prevails, and in more than half
of cases the perpetrators are linked with the state.
During the investigation into Sánchez’s disappearance, the entire police force of Medellin de Bravo was detained
by state prosecutors. A former police officer confessed to
participating in the murder, claiming he did so “by direct order” of
Martín López Meneses, deputy director of the municipal police in
Medellin. Sánchez had been threatened by the mayor three days before
being kidnapped.
In June 2011, Frank William La Rue – then UN special rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression – warned that
Mexico was the most dangerous country in the Americas for
communicators. La Rue documented 66 cases of murders against journalists
between 2000 and 2010, and 12 disappearances between 2005 and 2010, of
which few have been solved.
As with diseases that have a new outbreak after they were believed
eradicated this evil came back to life eight years ago, when
then-President Felipe Calderón, of the conservative PAN party,
declared a “war on drugs”, with logistical support and funding from the
US. Violence against the press walks hand-in-hand with the violation of
human rights, the criminalisation of social protest, and the so-called
war on drugs. Impunity gives criminals carte blanche. Organised crime
and its networks of complicity with those in political power have
further aggravated the tense situation in Mexico.
Many reporters and media organisations are terrified. With increasing
frequency, journalists are seeking asylum in the US. Others choose to
publish anonymously and many avoid writing about events that could
endanger their lives.
“There is a border where dirty money becomes apparently clean ... and
it is on that border where the journalist runs a greater risk,” states a report
by Article 19. “It is not the consummate criminals who threaten the
journalists. It is the apparently legal powers and seemingly reputable
businesses that feel most threatened by the journalist’s work, precisely
because it is on that border where the journalist may denounce the
politician, policeman, soldier, or businessman that is in collusion with
organised crime.”
On April 2012, a new law, Ley para la Protección de Personas Defensoras de Derechos Humanos y Periodistas,
was approved and certain mechanisms to protect journalists were
implemented, including the adoption of cautionary actions and, in some
cases, police protection of individuals under threat.
But far for diminishing, violence against journalists keeps growing.
In 2013 alone 330 attacks against journalists, media workers and offices
were documented, making it the most violent year for journalists in Mexico since 2007.
On 3 February, the Washington Office on Latin America and Peace Brigades International described
the new legislation as insufficient, and said it does not provide for
timely responses to demands of protection. They blame the Mexican
government for discrediting and criminalising human rights defenders and
organisations, and highlight the levels of impunity enjoyed by
perpetrators of crimes against journalists and human rights defenders.
The flip side of the lack of freedom of the press in Mexico is the
high concentration of mass media ownership and control. Almost all (96%)
of Mexico’s commercial television channels are in the hands of two
corporations, Televisa and TVAzteca, and 80% of radio broadcasters are
owned by 13 commercial groups. Some of those groups control dozens of
networks.
This duopoly simultaneously provokes an enormous absence of
information as well as great scepticism about the news broadcast in
Mexico. During the general election campaign in 2012 thousands of young
people mobilised outside the studios of Televisa and TVAzteca to protest
the manipulation of information. The government passed new legislation
but the rules of the game essentially did not change.
A new federal law of telecommunications and radio broadcasting was
enacted in 2014, aiming to break down the media duopoly by creating a
new private television network. It has not yet materialised. Civil
society organisations were strongly critical of the new law, stating
that it limits the powers of the regulating body (which should be
autonomous), avoids the necessary mechanisms to fight monopolies
efficiently, restricts public and social media, and ignores the rights
of audiences.
Press freedom
in Mexico faces severe obstacles. To give guarantees allowing
journalists to exercise their profession, to fight impunity, limit the
power of monopolies and open spaces to public communication media are
important challenges. International attention is essential. More murders
like that of Moisés Sánchez must be prevented.
